Talk:June

June was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 21, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chronology (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chronology, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.ChronologyWikipedia:WikiProject ChronologyTemplate:WikiProject ChronologyChronology articles

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 17:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monthlong events In June

Does anyone know anything about this?

국가 명랑한 달 In North Korea

As this is the English Wikipedia, I'm tempted to just yank it...and that string ("국가 명랑한 달") generates zero google hits. Jim Douglas 07:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A little help?

Hello? This site usually meets my expectations but here it doesn't. Can anyone help improve this, especially this article plus more.211.28.128.76 09:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gay and Lesbian Pride Month

According to various news sources, President Clinton proclaimed June "Gay and Lesbian Pride Month", yet I haven't seen anything about this on Wikipedia, under this article or the ones on Clinton, LGBT History month, June observances, or LGBT. TigressofIndia (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pride month keeps getting added and removed. I'm not sure how to get the page locked, but it might be wise to do so.

Origin of name

In his Fasti, Ovid claims that the month is named after youths, "iuniores", in contrast to the previous month, May, named after elders, "maiores". Something should be said about this in the article. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 01:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea invades South Korea?

What's this about "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea invades the Republic of Korea."? Does that happen every June? I'm assuming that has happened in the past, so that doesn't belong here. I'm erasing it. CayenneGaramonde (talk) 21:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ovid Forgot One

One of the ancient historians (Tacitus? Suetonius? Dio?) mentions that June was to be changed to the name of an emperor due not only to the fact that the event that occurred to warrant the months original name change (Marcus Junius Brutus' overthrow of Rome's final king) was by then ancient history but also the Junius name was sullied by a latter Marcus Junius Brutus participating in an assassination. Someone please research and correct. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsignedt added by 66.64.111.18 (talk) 22:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

disambiguation?

There is no disambiguation at the start of the article. Most other months do, for example May: This article is about the month. For other uses, see May (disambiguation). I'd think June is somewhat normal as given name. 85.217.21.90 (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on June. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170102083720/http://www.hellenion.org/calendar/2017/2017HellenionCalendar.html to http://www.hellenion.org/calendar/2017/2017HellenionCalendar.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open RfC related to this article.

See Talk:List_of_month-long_observances#Keeping_this_article_and_the_various_articles_on_months_in_sync. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated removal of LGBT Pride month

@Stevenjohan988. Thank you for offering some kind of explanation for your removal. Regarding the reasons you gave in your edit summary...

1-this month is not celebrated worldwide its only in fact most of the world doesn't celebrate it. This appears to be true of every item on the list, with the exception of the Sacred Heart one. Do you object to the other list entries?

2-the pride month didn't exist and wasn't celebrated until 2021 (atleast outside usa). So? It's been celebrated intermittently in the US for about 2 decades. I don't see why it should matter that it has only recently begun spreading to other nations.

3-no wonder why the most islamophobic and christianophobia countries like Israel for example are the ones celebrating it. I don't see how this comment is relevant to the topic. Squeakachu (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The third one isn't relevant. It's incivility somewhere in the orbit of a personal attack (and potentially against policy for that reason). - Purplewowies (talk) 08:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"June 31st" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect June 31st and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 7#June 31st until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:June/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk · contribs) 03:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 17:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this review; it will be used for the WikiCup. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

A source spot-check has been done:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Source spotchecks

Seven randomly chosen citations:

28 in combination with 29, cites the sentence "The most well-known month-long observance in the United States in June is Pride Month, which is the celebration of LGBT individuals and the advancement of their civil liberties"; I do not see where "the most well-known month-long observance in the United States" is supported, nor "the celebration ... of their civil liberties".
5 I do not see where "entered English in the 13th century via the Anglo-Norman join, junye and junie" is supported by the source
61 good
21 good
60 good
44 good
13 can't access; AGF

General comments

The nominator is the majority author, so all good on that front.
The source spotcheck above shows a couple of issues; I will thus perform another spotcheck before the close of the review.
The "Observances" section needs work.
- The first sentence is about Catholicism, but is not in the "Religious observances" section.
- I don't see much coverage of non-Christian or non-western holidays/observances. Are there no Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Shinto, Taoist, or Jain holidays which can occur in June? Are month-long observances all North American/Caribbean/British?
File:2018 San Francisco Pride.jpg's caption should describe both the immediate context of the image and the background, rather than just the latter.
I'll put this review on hold while the above issues are sorted out. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! Unfortunately I have had unexpected delays, but I will hopefully be able to get to this soon if you spare me a few weeks. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to keep this on hold for a further two weeks, until 23 April. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately unforeseen personal matters have rendered me unable to work on this article anytime soon. Please feel free to fail this GAR. My most sincere apologies and best regards, I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.