Jump to content

Talk:Juliet Stevenson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I think it makes more sense for us to use a film's actual title ahead of country-specific alternate one. For that reason I'm changing The Last Hangman (the U.S. title) to Pierrepoint (its original). - Chrism 20:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Theatre and Audiobooks

[edit]

Juliet is an award winning theatre actress and a well-known reader of audio books. I have added both sections. Vsanborn (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think her narration work for audiobooks should be highlighted more, as she has become a star in that function. Here is a link to a short free audiobook where she describes her work, in particular her masterful reading of Middlemarch: https://www.audible.com/pd/Juliet-Stevenson-Audiobook/B01N1EPJ4U?ref=a_lib_c4_libItem_B01N1EPJ4U&pf_rd_p=ae76b2bb-e63d-4a67-b357-dab3dee05ca1&pf_rd_r=9Y50MVGFN2SEMED2PHDP

MMR vaccine

[edit]

Is this seriously important enough to have in an article about an actress? It even says twice in two paragraphs that the research has been discredited - this is not an article about the MMR vaccine!86.174.137.225 (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also the information criticizing Wakefield work in the Lancet has itself been completely been discredited ,as have the pharmaceutical companies backing the attack, by the Highest Court in Britain, which overturned the decision of the corrupt Medical Board.GeorgeM60 (talk) (UTC) GeorgeM60 April 1 2012

MMR

[edit]

Now that there is a measles epidemic in Wales and threatening the rest of the United kingdom is it not time to recognise Ms. Stevenson's role in encouraging scepticism towards the medical establishment. Her political views are relevant enough for you to have mentioned a political broadcast but you have not mentioned her political role in causing illness and probably death to children. The following article from the time of the broadcast illustrates the point. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2003/dec/14/broadcasting.science — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomkirwan (talkcontribs) 20:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the article simply states that she appears in a movie. it provides no context as to what she says or does in the film. We would need something else per our policies of WP:OR / WP:BLP / WP:RS. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juliet Stevenson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Burstner v. Bürstner

[edit]

The article refers to Juliet Stevenson's role in The Trial as "Fräulein Burstner". In Kafka, the character is "Fräulein Bürstner". Is there a reason why the mention in the article should not be changed to "Fräulein Bürstner"? --Frans Fowler (talk) 03:31, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Frans Fowler (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]