Talk:Julie Nolke/Archive 1

Archive 1

Should we add her social media handles in the infobox?

I initially added it but user arjayay removed it Rasalghul1711 (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Multiple issues tag

Hi Wbcgqbvj, I think it would be helpful to review the edit summaries for the removal of tags that you continue to restore on the article, and discuss them here; attempts have been made to address the concerns through revisions and review of the basis for the tags. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 19:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Here is the edit summary from when I recently restored the orphan tag: [1], after this appeared to be the only issue remaining in your edit summary after you first restored all of the tags: [2]; here is the edit summary for a previous Coatrack tag removal: [3] that followed substantial revisions to the article that were also followed by further additions, e.g. [4]; here is an edit summary for the removal of Web tag, which does not appear to apply to a BLP: [5]. It is not currently clear to me what happened to the notability tag, but notability is being decided at the current AFD and seems a bit redundant to the pending discussion. Wbcgqbvj, I would appreciate it if you could specify your concerns after reviewing the edit summaries and if you could explain why you believe that the tags, (including the orphan tag, because this is contested in this edit summary: [6]), should remain on the article. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 20:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

In the meantime, I am removing the orphan tag, because after adding information to the Tastemade article, this artcle is no longer an orphan. Beccaynr (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

You added a trivial mention to Tastemade purely to justify removing the tag. A notable subject would likely already have links. As discussed in the AfD, this article probably fails WP:GNG/WP:NACTOR ("...Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." [emphasis mine]). Wbcgqbvj (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

There were three links added to the Tastemade article, including from The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, and this is not the only article to which she has been added since the orphan tag was placed on the article. If you do not have a substantive basis for the tags, it appears that they should all be removed from the article. Notability is being decided at the AfD discussion, the article is not an orphan, the web tag does not appear to apply to BLP, and the coatrack tag has been addressed by substantial revisions and additions of reliable sources. Beccaynr (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

There are two links to this article: List of Canadian actors (not really an article) and Tastemade. Both added by participants in the AfD discussion not because the subject merits these but to get around the orphan status. If the subject is a notable actor it's because of their roles, not because you've added their name to pages. Wbcgqbvj (talk) 16:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Wbcgqbvj, per WP:ORPHS, An article being an orphan [...] does not show a lack of notability, and therefore is not a valid reason for exclusion. An orphan is still capable of having reliable sources, and many do. De-orphaning articles and providing incoming links is a goal in improving the encyclopedia, not a requirement. After you reverted the addition to the Tastemade article twice, I have also started a discussion on the Tastemade Talk page with the goal of improving the encyclopedia, and invite you to participate. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 18:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)