Jump to content

Talk:Julie Kavner/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Carrie

I removed the section of this entry that stated that Miss Kavner starred in the 1976 Brian DePalma film Carrie. We all know she didn't; Sissy Spacek did. Jason.cinema 12:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

It still says she played Carrie White... did someone change it back? DavidRavenMoon 19:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

2011-2012 NYC (recent work)

In this article, currently, most descriptions of JK's work end around 2009, I think.

"Relatively Speaking,” a performance of three one-act plays, opened on Oct. 20, 2011 (closed Jan. 29, 2012) at the Brooks Atkinson Theater in New York City. One the plays, "Honeymoon Motel," a farce by Woody Allen, starred Julie Kavner.

An external cite from the New York Times is: http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/04/relatively-speaking-to-close-at-the-end-of-the-month/

Is a web URL an appropriate cite for a wiki entry?

Kathon (talk) 17:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Video games

Need to add The Simpsons: Tapped Out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.142.15 (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Julie Kavner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Julie Kavner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julie Kavner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Picture

Surely you guys could upload a more recent picture, right? I mean 1974 was way before the role she is most well-known for even existed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:ED02:A200:6833:827:1683:78A6 (talk) 07:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Removing Marge Simpson from infobox

Per WP:Manual of Style/Infoboxes, "The purpose of an infobox is to summarize, but not supplant, the key facts that appear in an article." The parameter "known_for" is "A brief description of why the person is notable" per Template:Infobox_person. This recent edit removed Kavner's role as Marge Simpson from the infobox with edit summary "Already listed in the article itself." It would be surprising if what any person is most known for were NOT already in the article. I believe Marge Simpson should stay in Kavner's infobox. HouseOfChange (talk) 13:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

For my knowledge, Marge Simpson is what this actress is best known for and therefore should definitely be in the infobox. Though looking at the other five Simpsons regular voice actors who appear first on the episode credits, these infoboxes don't show what they're best known for. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Look, I’m not trying to start an argument, but I don’t see a big deal with this issue, but you both do. None of the other Simpsons actors have known for in their infobox sections, why Julie Kavner!?!? It isn’t even a big deal. Users can remove what they want, you guys are NOT the Wikipedia police ok! You don’t directly own this article you know, were is the whole “Wikipedia, were anyone can edit” like they use too? It’s not anymore. It’s a dumb self centered control site were no one can correct and fix anything they want anymore like they use too. Seriously, just please give this a rest already I’m begging you, just leave that section alone. 2601:188:CC82:A030:DC61:12A7:B824:28D (talk) 20:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
The infobox template instructions linked above say that the "known_for" parameter allows people to add "A brief description of why the person is notable." Kavner would not have a Wikipedia article for her Rhoda work alone. It was her Marge that made her famous.
"Anyone can edit" Wikipedia, but when folks express differing opinions on how to represent the topic, the solution is to see whether a majority of the editors share the same opinion, forming a consensus. Most people here are okay with having the infobox parameter list Marge. ... Binksternet (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Procedural note. Duplicate signature placed there before I collapse the following discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Discussion needs to stay focused on the content, not the contributors. —C.Fred (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
You are alone in expressing the contrary. You have been using multiple IPs from Concord in New Hampshire (Special:Contributions/24.34.98.200, Special:Contributions/2601:188:CC82:A030:0:0:0:0/64) and from Boston (Special:Contributions/50.214.136.117) which means for you this is indeed "a big deal". If it was nothing important you would have let it slide after seeing most folks want to keep the parameter. At this point you have violated WP:MULTIPLE and are in danger of being blocked. Binksternet (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry Binksternet, but your no better, because you do the same thing. According to here:https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3722 and here:https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2586, you have a huge history of reverting edits and complains from so many users over the years, plus your rude to users too. But yes, I will agree with you that what I did was wrong, I should have known better and I apologize for it. But that still doesn't excuse your behavior over the years. I agree, my mother was right, I should have left wikipedia a LONG time ago. I have never seen a site that makes a big deal out of a tiny little edit… seriously. It still sickens me that wikipedia still keeps you around, even after numerous complains from everyone. So go ahead abd do what ever you want woth this article, I just don't care anymore, I should gave left this site a long time ago. Keep on messing up articles all you want, I was only trying to help improve it. I'm done. 2601:188:CC82:A030:DC9D:6F33:22A2:29FC (talk) 15:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Julie_Kavner/Archive_1&oldid=1239798548"