Talk:Julia Gasper

Julia Gasper has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 6, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Academic history

I had to remove the statement that 'Gasper obtained a D.Phil. in English Literature from Somerville College, Oxford' because it was unreferenced, I couldn't find any independent sources for it, and given the recent incident with Natasha Bolter (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2872325/Little-Miss-Fantasist-s-Ukip-candidate-sparked-uproar-accusing-party-boss-sexually-harassing-One-problem-investigation-reveals-s-hard-believe-word-says.html) another UKIPite whose claim to have studied PPE at Oxford was publicly denounced by the college in question, I think it is prudent enough to remove this statement until it can be proven by verifiable info. If you disagree with this, please state your opinion here before reverting any edits.Rayman60 (talk) 16:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the statement about Julia Gasper's English D.Phil. at Somerville back: she definitely has one. Hint to anyone uncertain about an Oxford D.Phil.: just search the Bodleian Library catalogue for the thesis, and you will also get the bonus of the date and subject. I have added a reference to this catalogue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.181.49 (talk) 08:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nitpicking time: Degrees are awarded by the University, not its constituent colleges. I'll tweak the lead to reflect this. --Ef80 (talk) 13:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Julia Gasper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm amazed, why won't anyone take up such a beautiful article? Well, I will! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No dablinks, no copyvio detected. Fairly well-written, only a few comments: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the lead,

Does this article not need an infobox?

In an ideal world, this article would indeed have an infobox, however at present there is no publicly available information with regards to when or where Gasper was born, no freely available image of her face etc. That being the case, any infobox would be so scanty that I don't think that it would even be worth including. Hopefully further information about Gasper will be revealed in future, allowing for the addition of an infobox. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure there is no information about her early life? This would be a natural question. Perhaps you can add a note earlier in the lead clarifying that no such information is there in reliable sources?

I've certainly not come upon any such information in the reliable sources. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Pink News" should be in italics, here and in a place or two elsewhere in the article.

Changed! Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In "Academic career",

You may want to write "twenty-six" (all of Dekker's twenty-six plays) in words so that it does not look very wordy. Also good per WP:MOSNUM.

I'm a little confused here; "twenty-six" already does appear in words rather than numerals? Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I meant digits. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 14:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you miss out adding sources for the third para?

It looks like that paragraph was added by another editor after I originally submitted the article to GAN. Given that there are no references cited, I shall remove this paragraph for now. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In "Political activity",

and being insufficiently grateful to heterosexuals for creating them I see some overciting after this line.

I've removed two of the four citations here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink paedophilia

I've added the link. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Homophobic" is linked twice

I've removed the second link. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be safe to add citations to Bibliography, though you mention the books earlier, just to ensure verifiability.

Added! Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any external links, portals or navboxes?

I've added a few portals at the end of the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf: Once more, many thanks for taking the time to conduct this GAN. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I am happy to promote this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julia Gasper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140602104638/http://www.oxford.gov.uk/Direct/OxfordEastElectionResults06May2010.pdf to http://www.oxford.gov.uk/Direct/OxfordEastElectionResults06May2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]