A fact from Julia Azari appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved during the following events hosted by the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Julia Azari has shown that U.S. presidents increasingly defend their legitimacy by claiming to have a political mandate? Source: I will give two paywalled reliable sources, but to make things as easy as possible here is the book's blurb. For real WP:RS, see Horton, Gemma (23 February 2018). "Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate". Information, Communication & Society. 21 (12): 1836–1838. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1442490; Seyb, R.P (1 December 2014). "Azari, Julia R. Delivering the people's message: the changing politics of the presidential mandate. Cornell, 2014. 206p index afp ISBN9780801452246 cloth, $39.95". CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries. 52 (4): 701.
(Long time since I did this!) The hook is hooky and short enough. The article is new and adequately referenced. The source given supports the hook and random checks of the text showed that the article is referenced well. Thank you Astrophobe. GTG Victuallers (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seeking consensus regarding recent changes by Leontrooper: the author of a newspaper article doesn't even choose the initial headline, letalone control the kind of editorial comments that might be made when a headline is rewritten. That part of the sentence isn't due weight in a biography of a living person, it's trivia about Washington Post editorial practices. I've modified the text to at least focus on the article subject. - Astrophobe (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Usually when something in a (online) newspaper article is changed, a note is added to inform the reader. Even if the change is trivial or served to correct a factual error. That did not happen here. It's part of the news story Ms. Azari was caught up in. Leontrooper (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
(Long time since I did this!) The hook is hooky and short enough. The article is new and adequately referenced. The source given supports the hook and random checks of the text showed that the article is referenced well. Thank you Astrophobe. GTG Victuallers (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)