Talk:Julia Allison

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 14, 2009	Articles for deletion	Kept
April 10, 2021	Articles for deletion	Deleted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 2, 2023.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Julia Allison has been described as one of the first influencers?

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 02:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Taylor Lorenz described Julia Allison as one of the first influencers? Source: "In the mid-2000s, Allison dominated the online world as one of the first multi-platform content creators. But practically no one recognized her as such, in part because there wasn’t language to talk about what she was doing. Today, she would be referred to as an influencer." Rolling Stone
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ghost Trick: Phantom Detective

Created by Thriley (talk) and Yngvadottir (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 13:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Julia Allison; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I will review this. BigDom (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - I think "condom fairy" could use a reference at least at the end of its sentence.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - needed
Overall: The article doesn't specifically state that Taylor Lorenz said it, but it is cited and Lorenz is given as the author, so it's OK for me. Just waiting on QPQ and an additional cite for "condom fairy". On an unrelated note, I think File:Julia Allison 2 Shankbone 2009 Metropolitan Opera.jpg would be a better choice for the lead image; it is higher resolution, slightly newer and a better view of her face. BigDom (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriley and Yngvadottir: Just pinging in case you didn't see this before. BigDom (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that Julia Allison has been described as one of the first influencers? Thriley (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think a shorter hook flows better. Thriley (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing the issue above and providing QPQ. Happy for this to go now and agree that the shorter ALT1 is preferable. Cheers, BigDom (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last name

@Sanskrita3000: You have removed her last name of Baugher claiming including it is somehow a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons violation. Her last name is mentioned in numerous articles over the past 15 years. Rolling Stone in 2023: [1], Slate in 2018: [2], Wired in 2008: [3]. What is your reasoning behind this? How is inclusion a BLP violation? Thriley (talk) 22:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also User talk:Sanskrita3000 and the aspects pointed out in this edit summary. Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allison's last name hasn't been Baugher since she was in college. None of her fame came with that name, and it's not relevant (ie: you wouldn't see Jennifer Aniston's post with her former last name). Honoring the privacy of living people is part of wikipedia's ethos. I think we should respect this. Sanskrita3000 (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a perhaps unfortunate aspect of being an encyclopedia that we list people's full names at the start of their articles, even if they're universally known by a nickname; it goes by reliable sources. Jennifer Aniston appears to be an unuseful comparison anyway; we list her parents' names as well as her full name, are you referring to her former married name? In this case, as Thriley says, multiple reliable sources give her birth name, including the very recent Rolling Stone article, which appears to rest partly on interviewing her (and presumably it's also in the book). She was also widely known for her college column and had already written magazine articles; see the Rolling Stone article, which was my source for the "rebranding" phrase: Lorenz wrote: "[After] arriving in New York .... Allison started writing under her first and middle name, Allison, instead of her real last name, Baugher." I'm afraid that horse is long out of the barn. I consider her father's and sibling(s)' name(s)—her father's and a brother's name are in a couple of sources—to be unnecessary personal information about non-public figures—but not her own original last name. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]