Jump to content

Talk:Jules Horowitz Reactor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A quick note

[edit]

This is an important but neglected article. For example it currently reads in part The construction of the reactor was funded by (which provided 50% of the project's funding), EDF (20%), various EU research institutes (20%) and Areva (10%) which I guess is an uncompleted edit. Watch this space, I'll be back, or better, diagnose it and fix it for me! Andrewa (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, see #Lost text restored below. Andrewa (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jules Horowitz Reactor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lost text restored

[edit]

I've restored a couple of points that were somehow lost in editing over the years.

I originally intended to investigate just how they were lost, see #A quick note above, but have decided to just fix them. There's no obvious vandalism in the article history. If anyone wants them removed again, please discuss! TIA Andrewa (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]