Talk:Judy Ann Santos/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Copyright violation

This sure seems like a copyright violation from here, unless someone shows otherwise I'm going to stub it. The source doesn't look like it came from Wikipedia. Rx StrangeLove 04:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

It is indeed pasted from that site. I already reverted it the last non-copyvio, non-vandalized version. What's next is getting the facts about the subject from that website. --bluemask ^(talk) 05:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

NPOV

Added NPOV marker. Removed excessive capitals in headings. Derby Dave 06:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

I removed a bunch of capitals, and assuming they were the titles of a movie or tv show i put them in italics. Fixed a few spelling errors here and there.

What language are all these movies in? I know it uses a latin alphabet, but thats about it.

Bearingbreaker92 14:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Could be Tagalog... Monni 04:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Still too many capitalized/all-caps words and people are adding more. Monni 17:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Sectioning

The article's sections need some serious sorting out. I reckon it could go something like:

• Biography

(early life etc)

• Acting career

• Film (inc. award nominations)
• Television (inc. 'Komiks' which according to history of this article is "a tv sitcom aired in TFC every Sunday night with Ryan Agoncilio.award nominations".)

• Musical career

• Discography (inc. award nominations)

• Romantic life (if appropriate)
• Endorsements

Anyone want to give it a shot? IT IS NEARLY 4AM HERE otherwise i would do it myself KZF 03:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I started cleaning up the sectioning, but it still needs a lot of work. Monni 11:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Some good work tidying. Much of the material in the lists could be ditched, though, to be honest; there's more there than in the articles on most major artists. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I was 50-50 to remove all nominations, because I think only wins are enough encyclopedic to merit own section. Monni 13:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree (that's what I've done on other articles). --Mel Etitis (Talk) 15:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, can I get in on this? The page is in an awful state right now, and I'm here to help. I'm a new member of the Wikipedia:Cleanup_Taskforce, and I picked this article out of the list of those needing help. Sorry it took so long. I'll get started on some sorting and grammar problems ASAP. Just don't ask me to verify facts. That's up to youse guys.

Reverend Lee 13:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup Taskforce

Let's start fresh. Does anyone have ANY sources for any of the info on this page? I mean, YIKES!

Reverend Lee 13:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think the page has been cleaned up significantly. The fact are up to you guys. But the format is there. I'll be looking back in from time to time, but for now you are on your own.

If there are no objections, I'll pull the Cleanup ticket. -- Reverend Lee 07:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Is this table format appropriate for this type of article? Most actor biographies on wikipedia do not use this sort of table format for listing movies. It seems a bit excessive and messy looking to me. See Ed Harris and Rob Lowe for examples on how the tradional actor filmography is presented. Also, is it really necessary to list every movie she's ever been in? Surely her major roles would be enough with a link to IMDB? That's what IMDB is there for after all. --Lendorien 16:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a bit too much too... Monni 16:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

It may be too much, but as for the format itself, it is a legitimate layout for actors. See Audrey Hepburn, Salma Hayek. Consider doing a Selected Filmography section and then linking to a complete listing. See James_Stewart_filmography, Henry_Fonda_filmography, Clint_Eastwood_filmography, or Humphrey_Bogart_filmography for examples.

See also Wikipedia:Cleanup_Taskforce/Judy_Ann_Santos for more information. — Reverend Lee 03:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Descriptions of films

First, "romance-comedy" isn't English — the phrase is "romantic comedy". Secondly, most (all?) romantic comedies contain dramatic and other elements; there's no need to add the terms. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Juday graces Yes! magazine

Juddy Ann covers Yes!

--Florentino floro 13:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

hi gud pm po, im the avid fan of judy ann santos, medyo naguluhan lamang po ako.... dahil kanina napanood ko ung interview nilang tatlo with her mother and kuya sa moms of Qtv, nabanggit ni judy an na may anak na sya... toto po bang meron n syang anak? parang di ko kc nabalitaan yun, this is gen of caloocan City thanks and more power... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.241.168 (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Johann is their adopted daughter. --Florentino floro (talk) 10:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Engagement

I added this since this is the greatest moment of her life: On May , 2008, Judy Ann Santos, 30, and Ryan Agoncillo were officially engaged, as Ryan proposed, while Judai tearfully accepted the diamond engagement ring. They were on vacation in Visayas with adopted daughter Yohann, and a wedding date is yet to be announced.Inquirer.net, Judy Ann Santos, Ryan Agoncillo officially engaged--source--Florentino floro (talk) 10:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Santos and Ryan Agoncillo had finally confirmed their engagement on June 19, 2008. "It's official, Judy Ann and Ryan are engaged!" shouts the cover of YES! Magazine's July 2008 issue.GMA NEWS.TV, Judy Ann, Ryan confirm their engagement--Florentino floro (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Merge:

Please unify filmography and awards onto the subject's main page.--Tznkai (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Why was this done? The lists are long enough for separate articles. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Notice to Wiki Admin due to Acts of User Active Banana

Such user is always deleting the proclaimed title of Judy Ann Santos claiming that it was WP:PEACOCK. Source/s to support such title, though, is not necessary since it was acclaimed by all media practitioners (i.e. people in the showbiz industry). Though reference was provided by 125.60.204.82, it can't be inserted since it was her certified title.

Plus, it is evident that user: Active Banana is a fan of Claudine Barretto who is considered by others to be Santos's rival. Several edits were apparent in Barretto's page by Active Banana who just inserted redundant notes/awards which are already mentioned in the latter part of the page. Said page was being edited previously, but again was revised in fan/s viewpoint to bulk up the page. Demipeach (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Please provide these reliable, third party sources unrelated to the subject of the article that have made these claims- not a publicity article by the studio the actor works for in which the subject of the article herself is stating that she has been called some title or other. We need to be able to verify content in articles, particularly articles about living people: "material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion"

And please remember to assume good faith about your fellow editors and be civil and not make unfounded claims about other editors motives. Active Banana (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Young Superstar

It's sad to reckon that Wikipedia, though an online encyclopedia system can be modified/edited by anyone and what's annoying are the actions of some who consider themselves as authorized entity, setting their own interpretations of Wikipedia rules. Following are the example issues to support my claim: - Deleting the title "Young Superstar" due to according to him/her it was a WP:PEACOCK, always looking of sources proving the title. Question: are the other titles (Superstar, Star for all Seasons, Megastar, Diamond Star) were declared or given by a special authorized body? Those are exaltations coming from people in the showbiz industry that have been adopted and recognized by all media practitioners, and the masses. No official statement/document can be presented since they're all widespread label that everybody adopts. And the title "Young Superstar" is not a fan-based titular provision, because, like the others, it came from all media practitioners which can be read or heard or seen anywhere. - Maybe Active Banana has his/her own standards or way of interpreting the title Young Superstar? Maybe Judy Ann's achievements are not enough for her/him to prove her worth in her field? - Lastly, are you an authorized person to decide on important things such as this? No wonder why in the future, Wikipedia can be considered as unreliable source of information for concealing that facts and letting these incidents to occur.125.60.204.82 (talk) 14:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Please read our policies and guidelines including: WP:V / WP:NPOV / WP:PEACOCK / WP:PROMOTION / WP:NOTMYSPACE / Wikipedia:MOS#Titles_of_people etc etc. We are not here to publicize or promote any individual. Promotional titles are completely unacceptable. What is truly unfortunate is that we must spend hours and hours and hours of time to keep WP:FANCRUFT and WP:TRIVIA from overloading truly encyclopedia content. Active Banana (talk) 14:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC)