Talk:Judgment Day (2007)

Judgment Day (2007) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Judgment Day (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

St. Louis Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-GA review

The article is looking good. I did some copyediting, but I wanted to mention a few things here:

In the second paragraph of the "Background" section, I'm confused by this sentence: "Both men escaped the steel cage at the same time therefore Mark Henry made his return and attacked The Undertaker." I'm not sure that I see the link between the two events.
Done.
~~In the next sentence, a brief explanation of what a Money in the Bank contract is would be helpful to non-wrestling fans.~~
Done.
~~In the first paragraph of the "Event" section, why did Carlito fall down?~~
Done.
In the fourth paragraph of the "Aftermath" section, it would help to explain that Khali's foot being under the rope led to the rematch at One Night Stand. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense to mention the foot in the "Event" and "Results" sections.
Done.

That's all that I can find. I hope this helps, and please get in touch if you have any questions. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This ones looking pretty good, just a few minor issues.

~~The first paragraph in the event section is a little choppy and vague. Why did Carlito fall down? How/what did Carlito hit Flair with to cause him bleed~~
- Done. –L A X 00:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Should it be mentioned that Michaels was legitimately injured before the event?~~
- Done. I added that he had a legitimate knee injury coming into the event. –L A X 00:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's all for now. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 23:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted. Good work. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

According to this, a lot of the links in the article have gone dead. I would search WWE.com or get the archived versions from archive.org. Nikki311 00:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure I've already fixed all those. –L A X 00:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Judgment Day (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]