Talk:Jude Law/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: B3251 (talk · contribs) 19:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Adri-at-BYU (talk · contribs) 21:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll begin reviewing today and plan to have my notes up by the end of the day Friday. Please let me know if you have any comments or questions! Adri-at-BYU (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, please let me know when updated! [[User:|B3251]] (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@B3251:: Looks great, comments are all done and I'm sticking it on hold! So sorry it took me longer than planned. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns! I'll keep a close eye to make sure I respond quickly. Adri-at-BYU (talk) 20:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Please take a look at 1a, 1b, and 2d

1. Well-written

a. Y(addressed) Clear and concise prose

Consider removing "while Caine played the role originated by Olivier" from the second paragraph of the 2000-2008 section. the sentence has a lot of info in it and taking out this extra info could make it easier processing.
Under Activism, adjust to say "Law, representing PETA, wrote a letter..." The source says he was representing PETA not PETA was representing him.
Under Afghanistan peace efforts, clarify whether the second paragraph is referring to a new documentary or The Day After Peace one. (maybe add in the name)
Under Family and relationships, add a comma and they "Law and co-star Sienna Miller began a relationship, and they became engaged in 2004." or "Law and co-star Sienna Miller began a relationship; they became engaged in 2004."

b. Y(addressed) MoS compliance

Early work and breakthrough section, consider removing "magnetic" from the third paragraph. I think "swimming star" covers it

2. Verifiable with no original research

a. Y List of references

b. Y Sources cited inline

Realtime movie section third reference, the archived link doesn't seem to pull up the right thing, here's the non-archived version at least https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-exquisite-art-of-mobbing-jude-law-pxgn7jxl87l

c. Y No original research

d. Y(addressed) No copyright violations or plagiarism

2000-2008 section, try to find the information on The Holiday from elsewhere. The interview is good but the channel doesn't appear to be the originator of the content

3. Broad in its coverage

a. Y Addresses main aspects of the topic

b. Y Focused on topic without unnecessary detail.

4. Neutral

Y Gives due weight to viewpoints presented about Law among various sources

5. Stable

Y Not under any edit wars or dispute (not counting title change discussion because it won't affect the content of the article)

6. Illustrated by media

a. Y all images have proper copyright statues attached

b. Y images are all relevant and short captions give good context Adri-at-BYU (talk) 20:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adri-at-BYU Thank you for the review, I have finished making all necessary changes. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find the interview or transcripts elsewhere for 2d, so I removed information regarding it and used a newspaper source to cite his role in the movie instead. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@B3251: Great work, I'll go pass it now!