Talk:Joyful, Joyful/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 15:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- Lead
- Good. It could be rewritten to be a little more clear but that's just a recommendation.
- Fixed some minor mistakes there.
- Background
- Great
- Composition
- Great, although i think it could be made a little bit longer.
- Critical reception and performance
- Great, although i think those could be better as subsections of "Reception".
- Credits
- Good.
- Charts
- Good.
- References.
- Good.
The article is great. It passes the criteria. Cheers! —Hahc21 20:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.