Talk:Journalists of The Wire

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Wire task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Whitting and Klebanow=Carroll and Marimow

It has been discussed in articles in various publications (e.g. this Columbia Journalism Review article) that there will be versions of Carroll and Marimow in this season's Wire. As most such articles were published prior to the beginning of the season, the individual characters are not named, but it seems fairly obvious that the executive editor with the wasp name is Carroll, and that the managing editor with the name ending in "ow" is Marimow. Is this really debatable? john k (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's quote from that article, btw:

In April, a friend of mine was scheduled to participate in a storytelling series called “The Stoop” at a Baltimore arts organization called Creative Alliance, and it turned out that Simon was on the bill, too, so I went. The theme was “My Nemesis,” and after six fantastic tales, Simon stepped to the stage in an untucked black shirt and jeans. “My nemesis,” Simon said graciously, “is whoever asked me to follow that up.” Simon then set up his own story. He described himself as a grudge-holder nonpareil, motivated only by an egotistical need to prove to people that they were wrong and he was right. “So naturally,” he said, “the place I needed to be was in journalism.” He was happy at the Sun, he told the full house, but then Marimow and Carroll came along.
Simon slammed their vision of journalism. He trashed the work they were most proud of, mocked their social graces, and dropped on them a generous payload of f-bombs. “Whenever they hear the word ‘Pulitzer,’ they become tumescent,” he said. Naming a nasty fourth season Wire character “Marimow” wasn’t enough, so Simon cast one-dimensional caricatures of Carroll and Marimow for the fifth season just to put a finger in their eyes.
The twist in the story, in Simon’s telling, is that when he heard about Carroll’s heroic stand at the Los Angeles Times and about Marimow’s recent bout with prostate cancer, he felt bad. And then, when his actors started filling out the characters as real, complex human beings, he realized his own smallness and pettiness. Good storytelling dictated that the season would have to fully develop the characters and confront the bigger issues currently facing journalism, not just irritate his old “asshole bosses.”

Once one watches this season, this seems pretty syllogistic - Whitting and Klebanow are Carroll and Marimow. john k (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely agree having already read the article you linked to. I tagged them for citations because we need to show the source to readers of the encyclopedia so they can verify the information. Once you've worked the source article into a citation template and added the reference to wikipedia article we can take the fact tags down. For now I'm focusing on the nuts and bolts of the new series before I get into the deluge of recent media coverage but appreciate anyones help including this kind of information.--Opark 77 (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think the CJR article is good enough as a source? It doesn't specifically say Whitting is Carroll, but it seems like a fairly obvious implication. john k (talk) 14:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its better than no source but some still might consider it OR. We should perhaps ite the atlantic article by Mark Bowden and the Esquire piece by Simon directly as well. We can write more info on the real world grudge fuelling some of the writing over on Simon's page. I believe some of these articles are already sourced there so we could import the citations.--Opark 77 (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Journalists of The Wire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080321045636/http://www.stoopstorytelling.com/shows/19/storytellers/169 to http://www.stoopstorytelling.com/shows/19/storytellers/169

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]