Talk:Jotdog (album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JayJay (talk · contribs) 17:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm going to do a quick review here.

Comments

This article does not maintain an Neutral point of view, in the lead it says "The album received positive reviews, with critics commending Amaro's production and Barracuda's lyrics, and comparing their lineup and musical style to the bands Garbage and Mecano." In the "Critical reception and accolades" however only mentions one review praising in the album. Also it says "The singles from Jotdog, "Hasta Contar a Mil", "Resistir" and "Las Pequeñas Cosas", were well received by the audience" but the reference isn't very specific on who the audience is and why they like it. Also instead of "Critical reception and accolades" scratch accolades and put awards or create a separate section. So it not only fails for neutral point of view, broad in coverage it also fails for having non-reliable sources. In the backround section reference 5 is not reliable as it looks like it is a forum and the biography could have been written by anybody. Also for the section "Recording process" replace it with Writing and Production. It also isn't broad in coverage as it says in the lead "Jotdog promoted the album by performing the songs in a number of live appearances" there is no reference to support that claim and no section. There also isn't a section for composition for any of the songs, it doesn't mention if it charted on a board of some country. I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:Albums, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Good article criteria.

Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am failing this article for the above issues/comments. Please re-nominate when these issues have been fixed and if you have any questions don't be afraid to shoot my a message on my talk page JayJay^{What did I do?}