Talk:Joshua Fit the Battle of Jericho

"African-American spiritual"

Really? This is one of those instances of naive political correctness where using the PC term actually destroys the meaning of what is being said. "African-Americans" are American citizens who are "of African ancestry". The entire point about Negro spirituals is that these people were not citizens, American or otherwise, they were slaves. It's the sad historical reality, and also what gave rise to this genre in the first place. Calling them "African-American spirituals" in retrospect is not only funny, I think it is even being a little flippant about the plight these people were in. --dab (𒁳) 13:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind if you change it - I wasn't sure (and didn't check) what WP:MOS says, if anything. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that that change is appropriate in this case, but I wouldn't just laugh off the usage of "African American spiritual" as naive or call it flippant. We don't have an article titled Military history of Negroes in the American Civil War either, nor do we categorize "Choo Choo Ch'Boogie" as race music anymore, even though that term provides historical context just like "Negro spirituals" does. I do think it is appropriate to change it here, albeit because of the body of scholarly work, including contemporary scholarly work, using this term, not because I'm afraid of being overly PC (and note that the term "African American spiritual" can be found in modern scholarly work too). ---Sluzzelin talk 15:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joshua Fit the Battle of Jericho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]