Talk:Joseph Favre/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 16:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
- Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
- Contains a short description which complies with recommendations.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
- All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
- All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
- Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- No original research.
- No copyright violations or plagiarism.
- Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
- Neutral.
- Stable.
- Illustrated, if possible.
- Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.
I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Points to be considered
[edit]Hello, Asilvering. Hope you are well. I have just a few points, including two small changes I've already done.
- I think, per MOS:JOBTITLES, that "bishop of Orléans" should be capitalised as it always references Félix Dupanloup in his official capacity, though not in the generic sense when it is only "the bishop laughed". I have an open mind on this, however. What do you think?
- I wikilinked Valais as a canton only. I agree that countries like Switzerland should not be linked.
- I amended the quotation in the last years section. The reference is normally placed after the colon to precede the blockquote; and in this case it applies to both sentences.
And that is it. This is unquestionably a good article and it passes the review. The man was a culinary genius and I've got an appetite now, after reading the article. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- @No Great Shaker Thanks very much! I see what you mean about the bishop title - I'll change that to capitalize it. -- asilvering (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)