Talk:Josef Mengele/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Secret (talk · contribs) 00:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this within the next few days. Thanks Secret ^account 00:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Secret! Thank you very much for taking this on. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is an organization(club) of surviving twins from the Mengle studies. I beleive about 400 members, at least until recently. The inclusion of their group and maybe input in the article would be interesting. 159.105.80.101 (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I heard of this too, but I can't seem to find a source. -- Diannaa (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this review would be heavily time consuming when I took it, but personal life got in the way and sorry it took three weeks to finally reviewing it. Once I read through the article, I was surprised. The article is in pretty good shape overall with no major flaws preventing it from GA status. The citations is reliable, I had a copy of Gerald Posner's Mengele book and he is reliable as a historian, but it seems to be in my old home so I no longer have a copy. No close paraphrasing concerns with the online sourcing. I'll be quick passing this article for GA as I don't have much concerns with the prose. What I thought it would be a long and difficult process ended up as a quick pass. I apologize for the wait. If you decide to do a peer review, I could probably review the content further as I will have access to some of the books. Thanks Secret ^account 18:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Secret for reviewing the article. Best, -- Diannaa (talk) 18:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]