Jump to content

Talk:Jose Chung's From Outer Space/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Glimmer721 (talk · contribs) 00:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will review this soon. Glimmer721 talk 00:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did some copyediting yesterday, mainly just italicizing The X-Files and other conventions in the "Reception" section, and I removed the small formatting on the ref tags. Glimmer721 talk 00:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • One redirect which leads back: [1]
  • Is Fox supposed to be in all caps?
  • "The episode is a stand alone episode, like most episodes of The X-Files, and follows the normal Monster-of-the-Week pattern of the show. However, more humor than is typical for the series is injected via manipulation of point of view, leading to multiple re-tellings of certain events with varying degrees of unreliable narrators." This is very OR-ish...do the sources talk about how The X-Files usually consist of stand-alone episodes and this one is more humorous? I'm sure there is a way to reword it without the OR anyway.
  • "A pair of teenagers in their car are captured by a pair of grey aliens"...quite repetitive; I would change the first to "Two teenagers..."
  • Contraction "aren't" in first sentence of "Production" section
  • Why does Alex Trebek's caption say "(2009, Marabuchi)"? I can't find anything on the image page which mentions that was when and who the picture was taken by.
  • Who is Ray Harryhausen (director, writer, etc; it would clarify the sentence)
  • "The writer claimed to be burned out and not cut out for the frantic pace of the show"...I would put "burned out" and "not cut out" in quotes if he really said that; otherwise reword to soun more formal.

I've got to go but I'll be back soon to look over the last section! It's generally pretty good so far, no major problems. :) Glimmer721 talk 00:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm back... Glimmer721 talk 03:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's it--I will place this on hold while these minor issues are addressed. Glimmer721 talk 03:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I believed I've fixed all the problems. Will wait for you to re-evalutate!--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! I will pass this. Glimmer721 talk 00:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]