This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
I wont address his Wp:OWN issue, since I believe it will become a moot point as the discussion goes on. As for specifics of my revert.
1. As for THIS EDIT, the lead is too long: Every article needs a leded, implying that 1 paragraph is too long is way off.
2. As for THIS EDIT, famous: This is a don't care; either way iif fine with me, go ahead remove the word famous if you object to it that badly. It is, however, not a violation of WP:PEACOCK.
3. As for THIS EDIT, removal of the Ponce link from See also: WP:MOS supports this.
(4a) CN banner: Every paragraph has at least one citation, therefore no cites are missing
(4b) SPS banner: Dr. Gandara has been dead for 50 years, and the publication is from the administration of the public, Commonwealth, government school that bears his name in his honor, as such this is not an SPS. To be exact, the information was reprinted from El Mundo as the article states.
5. As for THIS EDIT, Geocities unreliable and SP: You will have to explain how this is unreliable and self-published. Or take it to WP:RSN. IAE, WP:TAGBOMBing and being WP:POINTy, as you did, "is highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban".
6. As for THIS EDIT, one of Ponce's greatest physicians.: If the phrase bothers you and your preference is to risk text copyright violation by using the exact same words as those used by the citation, go ahead and knock yourself out, but I don';t support it.
7. As for THIS EDIT, article citation format: WP:CITE, "templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style"
8. As for THIS EDIT, repeated citation: Changing all citations to fit one's preferred style is no different that edit warring over leaving the version of the text that reflectrs one's won preferences instead of consensus.
9. As for THIS EDIT, repeated citation (again): Again, changing all citations to fit one's preferred style is no different that edit warring over leaving the version of the text that reflectrs one's won preferences instead of consensus.
10. As for THIS EDIT, changing a title name: By your own admission you did not know the title name, so you speculated in changing it. WP:OR
11. As for THIS EDIT, proper page title spelling - after guessing: If you are not proficient in Spanish, you should not venture by guessing. This should had been an undo rather than to continue guessing.
12. As for THIS EDIT, format: WP:CITE, "templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style"
13. As for THIS EDIT, lumping 3 banners together: This would had been a moot point if you had tageed it with one 1 banner to begin with.
Regards, please discuss objections here instead of reverting. Reverting can get you blocked from editing this and other articles. Mercy11 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
