Jump to content

Talk:José María Valderas Martínez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Obviously not familiar with "relevance" criterion for real persons, but wonder what are the objective criteria for this. I have been checking some individuals profiles of people also born in 1972 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terran_Sandwith, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sami_Yli-Sirni%C3%B6 and do not see why the contributions to own field make the person less relevant of any of these other persons. Would be ready to shorten if appropriate, but still not sure about what is the criterion for relevance as long as data are accurate.Jmvalderas (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Applying standard criteria

[edit]

In relation to standard criteria for these type of articles:

"They are often biased, usually positively. People will write overly positively about themselves, and often present opinions as facts. Wikipedia aims to avoid presenting opinions as facts." Only factual information is presented. Note that no single ADJECTIVE is used.

"They can be unverifiable. " All data are verifiable. THere are no such things as hopes, dreams, thoughts, or aspirations.

"They can contain original research." It does NOT contain original research.

I have not been able to find an explicit criterion about "relevance". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmvalderas (talkcontribs) 18:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on José María Valderas Martínez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]