Talk:Jorian Jenks

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Regarding the issues raised about notability I feel that his notability is based on the following:

Jenks was a leading member of the British Union of Fascists, to the point that he was nominated as a successor in the event of Oswald Mosley's imprisonment. This was not made clear in the article and has now been added in.
As the sole architect of the BUF's agricultural policy Jenks was responsible for a large part of the party's policy and, whilst it was never implemented due to the BUF never forming a government, his ideas proved influential on a number of government initiatives. Again, this was not made clear in the article and has now been added.
Jenks was a leading figure of the organic food movement and a pioneer in this respect. Although this was mentioned it has now been detailed more, including a quote in the first paragraph that indicates his importance to the movement.
He was closely involved in a number of post-war rural pressure groups, some of which are still in existence, and produced a high volume of written work for them.
Jenks has been covered in detail in a number of independent, third-party sources, as indicated in the references. He has also been covered by an article in a peer-reviewed, academic journal devoted entirely to his career. This article has only just been added to the entry as it was not available to me until now. However I feel that the addition of citations from this article, as well as its very existence, makes an important stride in demonstrating the notability of the subject. Whilst this in itself only "presumes" notability according to Wikipedia:Notability the above points demonstrate his notability whilst this one shows how widely covered he has been.

I'm not altogether familiar with the etiquette in these cases and so I will not remove the tag that has been added yet. However I do feel that notability has now been established and if no comment is taken within a week I must assume that to be the case and will go ahead and remove the tag.Keresaspa (talk) 15:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have been bold and removed the tag -- clearly notable. – ukexpat (talk) 15:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm glad it was somebody other than me as I could be accused of having too much of a vested interest, as I'm responsible for most of it.Keresaspa (talk)

Comment I put the original tag there, and would have removed it when I had seen the changes. Looks perfectly fine now. As for your "wait a week", that is a good way to deal with it when you are the main contributor. One reason that I personally use the {{notability}} tag is to show other editors that the article is already being watched, and to avoid a more hasty editor putting a speedy tag, as the article didn't have a clear claim of notability in the introduction. PHARMBOY ^{(moo) (plop)} 15:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. There were a good few things I missed out and if I had not seen the tag I probably would not have gotten round to adding them for ages so perhaps it's as well that you did. Keresaspa (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good attitude. In theory, that is what the tags should do. They aren't just to nag, they are to inspire someone to make changes to improve the article. Sometimes I will just be roaming an article and see a FACT tag or similar and think "man, I know I can source that" and just fix it. I have seen several potentially good articles get speedy deleted simply because they were started without a clear claim of notablity to begin with. We have to sift through so many articles here, sometimes it is difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff when you do it so fast. PHARMBOY ^{(moo) (plop)} 16:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jorian Jenks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003020511/http://www.oswaldmosley.com/jorian-jenks.htm to http://www.oswaldmosley.com/jorian-jenks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]