Talk:Jorge Ángel Livraga Rizzi
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This question for User:NewAcropolis: your edit this. Please, talk me: what is this link "Official Livraga's biography"? And way is the site of Miguel Martínez not "Critics Links"? Thank you. John Barley 07:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC) PS. And please talk me about this your edit
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jorge Ángel Livraga Rizzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060127202304/http://www.acropolis.org/about/jal.aspx?lang=eng to http://www.acropolis.org/about/jal.aspx?lang=eng
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Templates.
[edit]Hi. I delete the templates because I suppose the problems cited have been eliminated. Please inform me of a possible error. Thank you.--ANESTRELLA (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Comments about the New Acropolis organization
[edit]Initially qualified as ", and a far-right paramilitary and/or religious cult according to its critics", without proper quotations, it is just an opinion and has the consequence of creating cyclic quotations, without being factual Azbarcea (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)