Talk:Joralemon Street Tunnel

Joralemon Street Tunnel has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 11, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in New York City Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

A fact from Joralemon Street Tunnel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that contractors digging New York City's Joralemon Street Tunnel found the remains of a ship?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joralemon Street Tunnel.

Wikipedia

This page says that the tunnel was flooded during Hurricane Sandy, but does not provide a detailed source. This article, Could New York City Subways Survive Another Hurricane? indicates that the tunnel did not flood. 170.28.136.41 (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joralemon Street Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Joralemon Street Tunnel had to be partially rebuilt during construction after its ceiling started to flatten? Source: "Construction of the Tunnel Presented Difficult Problems". Brooklyn Daily Eagle. January 9, 1908. pp. 26, 27.
- ALT1:... that the Joralemon Street Tunnel was the first underwater subway tunnel between the New York City boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn? Source: "Historic Structures Report: Joralemon Street Tunnel". National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service. February 9, 2006. p. 7.
- ALT2:... that contractors digging New York City's Joralemon Street Tunnel found the remains of a ship during construction? Source: "Find Old Ship Under Street". Brooklyn Citizen. March 11, 1905. p. 1.

Reviewed: Cortinarius scoticus

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Article was 5x+ expanded in the last 7 days (2057b to 15kb). QPQ has been completed. Article is well-written and adequately cited. No pings on Earwigs for copyvio or close paraphrasing. Hooks are interesting, cited, and short enough for DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joralemon Street Tunnel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 19:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"pair of tubes" is there a link for this? It just struck me as strange phrasing.
- Technically this is two tunnels, one each for Manhattan and Brooklyn-bound trains. However, they're almost always referred to as a singular pair. Epicgenius (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"first subway line" overlinked in the lead.
- Removed
"The tubes were ... The tubes are..." mildly repetitive.
- Fixed
"The tunnels had an outside diameter ' has it changed since construction?
- Fixed It has not. Epicgenius (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"by William Barclay Parsons, chief" overlinked.
- Removed
"in lower Manhattan to" ditto.
- Removed
"south to South Ferry, and then to Brooklyn." and those.
- Removed
"the East River, then" and that.
- Removed
"cost $9 million" inflate?
- Done
"blowout" what's that in this context?
- Added
"Parsons cast blame on the" blamed?
- Fixed
"Borough Hall.[13][59][1] ' order.
- Done
"terminus at 242nd Street or " overlinked.
- Removed
"inundated Lower Manhattan. The" ditto.
- Removed

Honestly, this is beyond good already. I struggle sometimes to come up with suggestions to improve, so I'm sorry for the bland and disinteresting comments on this one! The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 20:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the comments. I've resolved all of the issues now. It's really no problem (I think reviewers might be staying away from my articles for the backlog review because they're not problematic enough!). After a while, writing good articles tends to become easier. Epicgenius (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you. Anyway, this is done and dusted, passing, good work as usual. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 21:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]