Jump to content

Talk:Jonna Adlerteg/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 11:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Firefangledfeathers (talk · contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Picking this one up! Thank you, Riley1012, for working on this article. First review items will be out soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    Spot checked 7 sources (citations 14, 28, 36, 41, 51, 56, 73 as of this version as well as sources that came up naturally during the review. Minor issues described in review below.
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    Spot checks and Earwig came up clean.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    All aspects of a traditional athlete bio are present.
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    Stability evident in article history.
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    All licenses at Commons pass a smell test.
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    All good.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


GA review items

[edit]

Non-GA-criteria suggestions (optional)

[edit]

Items in this section are based on guidelines that are not part of the GA criteria. You are free to work on them or not, and progress won't matter for GA status. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Images could use brief alt text, mainly to indicate the ones in which she's demonstrating a gymnastics move. See MOS:ALT for guidance. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please review the links for overlinking. London and Tokyo, for example, do not need to be linked per MOS:OL. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. In §2012, should we mention that she didn't advance to the Olympic finals? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. The heavy use of press releases is not a GA disqualifier, but the overall strength of the article could be improved by using more independent sources. Some press release citations are redundant and can be removed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, consider using a parameter like "via" to indicate the citations that were retrieved from mynewsdesk.com. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Firefangledfeathers: just wondering if you had any further comments? -Riley1012 (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have more for you tomorrow! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Firefangledfeathers: Sorry to bother you again, any updates? Riley1012 (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Riley1012! Looks like I forgot to publish the most recent batch of items. More soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Firefangledfeathers, I believe I have addressed everything. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]