Talk:Jonna Adlerteg/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 11:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Firefangledfeathers (talk · contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Picking this one up! Thank you, Riley1012, for working on this article. First review items will be out soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I want to note for the record that I'm accessing the Swedish-language sources via machine translation, and I'm very willing to hear it if this causes an embarrassing error. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Stability evident in article history.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- All licenses at Commons pass a smell test.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- All good.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
GA review items
[edit]- Overall
- The bit about her 2013 medal being Sweden's first European one in 50 years is repeated in the lead and body. Is it true of all Swedish gymnastics, or just women's? Source seems to say it's limited to women. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Correct, it's just women's. This is fixed now. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox
- "She won the bronze medal on the uneven bars at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics." Is the relative status of the Youth Olympics low enough to break the chronological order for this? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I would say yes because it's a competition at the junior level. Normally we put senior results first in the lead then any significant junior results. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Non-GA-criteria suggestions (optional)
[edit]Items in this section are based on guidelines that are not part of the GA criteria. You are free to work on them or not, and progress won't matter for GA status. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Images could use brief alt text, mainly to indicate the ones in which she's demonstrating a gymnastics move. See MOS:ALT for guidance. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please review the links for overlinking. London and Tokyo, for example, do not need to be linked per MOS:OL. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey @Firefangledfeathers: just wondering if you had any further comments? -Riley1012 (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'll have more for you tomorrow! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Firefangledfeathers: Sorry to bother you again, any updates? Riley1012 (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)