Talk:Jonathan and Charlotte

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Are they Jonathan & Charlotte or Jonathan and Charlotte? Both this article and Britain's Got Talent (series 6) mix the two forms. As does the ITV website. Can we find out which is correct in order to standardise? — Smjg (talk) 13:06, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely Jonathan and Charlotte. All other reliable sources use 'and', not '&'. Unreal7 (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Their album has been released and it clearly uses 'Jonathan & Charlotte' on the cover, that's surely a pretty reliable source for the '&'.80.7.134.131 (talk) 22:41, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request as a News Archive search confirms. However, please, in the future, provide evidence supporting your request. This is becoming endemic: "X is the common name." "X is the primary topic", as an assertion only. To close such a request with due diligence requires me or anyone else to perform the search not done.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan & Charlotte → Jonathan and Charlotte

Most, if not all, reliable sources (including the show itself) identify them as Jonathan and Charlotte, not Jonathan & Charlotte. Unreal7 (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

personal lives

I am curious about Jonathan's ethnicity. He posted this photo to Facebook https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=525436250854924&set=a.525435537521662.1073741836.116506785081208&type=1&theater showing his sister. When they're both together, they certainly don't look northern European, possibly not even caucasian. Just curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Here's another photo of his beautiful sister. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=558443164220899&set=a.320299921368559.72901.116506785081208&type=1&theater Still wondering about their ethnicity. There's nothing about his personal life in this article at all.[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 18:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan and Charlotte → Jonathan & Charlotte – The album has the ampersand. It was "and" before, but not any more. Unreal7 (talk) 08:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Looking at Google News Archive, I get 401 hits for "Jonathan and Charlotte" Britain's Got Talent, compared to only 10 for "Jonathan & Charlotte" Britain's Got Talent. The album article, Together (Jonathan & Charlotte album), should be moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The album cover has the ampersand. Unreal7 (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan and Charlotte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]