Talk:Jonathan Stickland

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States: Texas / State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jonathan Stickland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— the pest-control industryInternetArchiveBot]] (Report bug) 23:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English and spelling

Hello PoliticalPoster007 --

One attends college at a named institution.
Encompass means to to surround. Wrong word.
Children's names don't belong in a political bio, unless they are relevant.
District 92 is not a person, therefore who is incorrect.
One either works in "a pest-control business", or in " the pest-control industry." Your choice, I don't care.
Issues don't do much of anything. Instigated is probably a better word.

This is an encyclopedia. The English needs to be good. I am trying to help you. I left the unsubstantiated claim that he is an "anti-abortion legislator." If you can bring the quote that proves that abortion is his defining issue, it can stay in. Otherwise, it's a POV problem. Rhadow (talk) 23:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Neutrality -- your attention is drawn to the post above. We are arguing about the language, not the content. Rhadow (talk) 03:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti vax stuff...

So, here's the thing. We can report what analysis has already been published, but Wikipedia isn't a forum to spout our own ideas about what someone thinks. Posting a tweet from this person and then offering analysis on that tweet is not reliably sourcing content. I removed the following sentence because it is simply a tweet, with accompanying original research. My opinion on whether or not what Strickland is promoting is "over children's health" is of no consequence for this article. What matters is are we reliably sourcing content. This sentence below is an example of us not doing that, so I'm boldly removing it. By all means, if someone reliably sources the printed opinion or discussion of views of what he thinks, go for it. Please don't add it back without proper sourcing.

He has also part of the anti-vax movement promoting "freedom from government" over children's health.^[1]^{[failed verification]}

Curdigirl (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Stickland, Jonathan (2019-05-08). "FACT: Some vaccinations contain human diploid cells from aborted children. #parentalrights #religiousfreedom #nomandates #txlegepic.twitter.com/OwfooOH65a". @RepStickland. Retrieved 2019-05-10.

[1] Stickland, Jonathan (2019-05-08). "FACT: Some vaccinations contain human diploid cells from aborted children. #parentalrights #religiousfreedom #nomandates #txlegepic.twitter.com/OwfooOH65a". @RepStickland. Retrieved 2019-05-10.

[1]