Talk:Joint Combat Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Cameron in humiliating u-turn on future of Britain's aircraft carriers with return of jump jet

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2130612/Cameron-makes-humiliating-u-turn-future-Britains-aircraft-carriers.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

So do we list this here, or just hammer on the Cameron and Tory party pages until his is forced to resign? Hcobb (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same stuff again. And while I won't condemn you for this post, Wikipedia authors high and mighty would as this is not a forum page. Alas, that's their dogmatic mindset.Phd8511 (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And a new leak argues for a reverse, again.

http://defense-update.com/20120424_which_f35_for_the_uk.html

I've really lost track if the timestamps on this study are before or after the political stuff above. Can or should we attempt to piece together a timeline on this? Hcobb (talk) 22:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tidball and Buchler

http://www.avionics-intelligence.com/news/2012/12/12/royal-navy-training-begins-on-new-f-35-fighter-jet.html They have joined the US Marines Fighter Attack Training Squadron, VMFAT-501, initially to complete F-35B flight training, which will take approximately 6 weeks. Following this they will become Instructor Pilots (IPs) on VMFAT-501, where they will train future USMC pilots to fly the aircraft. After gaining valuable experience on the aircraft Lt Cdr Tidball and Sqn Ldr Buchler will move to Edwards AFB, California where they will form part of a UK Test and Evaluation Squadron tasked with conducting operational tests on the new stealth fighter.

So how long will they be training USMC before moving on to the Test and Evaluation Squadron? Hcobb (talk) 12:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marham

It's noted that Marham is to recieve its first F-35 Joint Shite Fighters in 2015... welcome to 2016 and an F-35 Joint Money Pit hasn't flown in this country, and as far as I know, hasn't left America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.110.223 (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joint Combat Aircraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]