Talk:Johnson's criteria

Thermal vision

I would appreciate if any expert could transform the values for thermal vision, with number of pixels required for DRI. E.g. detection = 2px, recognition = 8px and identifcation = 12px. However there are several pixel counts given on the internet. Therefore I don't want to add it to the article, because I'm not an expert--Optimike (talk) 08:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson's paper online

I'm unable to find an online version of Johnson's 1958 paper. If you know one, the article would be greatly improved by it's addition. RSaunders 20:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harney reference

The link provided for the Harney reference does not go to the paper. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.5.217.3 (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Rename to "Johnson's criteria" (lowercase)

I request that the article be renamed "Johnson's criteria", with lowercase "criteria" as per Wikipedia's naming conventions for articles. --KYN (talk) 11:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly even simplify the title to "Johnson critera", without the 's. This form is also in common use and is a more common way of naming concepts related to a specific person. --KYN (talk) 12:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I verified that it's typically lowercase in books, and moved it. I agree that the non-possessive form is also about equally common in books; I didn't change that, but wouldn't object. Dicklyon (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a woman versus a man

I don't believe, that this is a good example, because even at bright daylight and short distance I sometimes have problems to distinguish for an unknown person, whether it's a man or a woman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michilans (talk • contribs) 12:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johnson's criteria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110517135236/http://www.nvl.army.mil/ to http://www.nvl.army.mil/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nps.navy.mil/se/harney/cbt1ch14.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]