Talk:Johnny Rosenblatt Stadium

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: Nebraska / Omaha Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska - Omaha (assessed as Low-importance).

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Untitled

I agree, the entire "Save Rosenblatt" section is unsuitable for an encyclopedia, most likely written by one of the whackos from the "Save Rosenblatt" committee. I recommend either a complete overhaul or outright deletion of the section. 204.58.233.6 (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for pulling the section as well. A re-write would be nice, but given the climate of the situation, it'd be tricky to write a truly fair and balanced article containing any information about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.177.25.208 (talk) 14:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:POLL101088762.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:POLL101088762.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sawblade05 ⁽^{talk to me} ^| ^{my wiki life}⁾ 10:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Rosenblatt and the Omaha Royals"

I feel that this section is a heavy editorial as well. Could it maybe be improved in the rewrite?JEDIMAN40 (talk) 04:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second paragraph of intro

This was not the last game played at Rosenblatt, not even the last baseball game. The last baseball game will be on sept 2, 2010 with the Omaha royals final game before the end of the season. The last game played period will be some weirdo game by the UFL. This is simply the last College World Series game. This should be spelled out. Barsportsunlimited (talk) 03:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Enigma^msg 03:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT by different person: Below is a link for the source of the Creighton Prep football game:

http://creightonprep.creighton.edu/page.cfm?p=2365 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.33.53.98 (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is tone encyclopedic enough now?

Other than something published to cite as the goals of the former "Save Rosenblatt" group, isn't this article generally encylopedic enough to lose the "tone" template?75.200.158.141 (talk) 14:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support a removal of the tone tag. Kithira (talk) 17:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Johnny Rosenblatt Stadium/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Nearly the entire "Efforts to Save Rosenblatt" section of this article is opinion. It is unfounded to say that the entire city of Omaha opposes the downtown stadium, especially when citing unscientific polls on a website (which is anything but neutral on the subject) to base results.

I have no dobut the stadium means a lot to South Omaha and the people who live around it. But contrary to the author(s) of this article, the entire city is not represented within the context of the article's editorial views. I'd like to motion that editors please clean up the content to eliminaite this bias. If the "facts" presented were backed up by references, I'd be happy to retract my comments.

Knuxie (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Johnny Rosenblatt Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120715174540/http://omaha.com/article/20090609/NEWS01/306099997 to http://omaha.com/article/20090609/NEWS01/306099997
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.omaha.com/article/20110308/NEWS01/110309704
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090704115313/http://www.rememberrosenblatt.com/ to http://www.rememberrosenblatt.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Johnny Rosenblatt Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]