Talk:John of the Cross/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about John of the Cross. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Pardon the glib factor. I gather most people visiting this article are "serious". I know, I get it....
However, if laughter isn't God's ultimate gift... to paraphrase Gene Rodenberry about laughter, "for that instant, you humans are immortal". I guess the same could be said of orgasms : ) Different beast, similar vibe. Just gotta love Dopamine, Serotonin and GABA : )
...Anyway, among the funniest beings ever is Doug Adams! It dissapointed me not to find any reference in the article links to Doug's "The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul". And to forestall, I've had to undergo several operations to reconstuct my thorax from reading Doug, but the one I'm presently bitching about I haven't been able to get yet...
Lighten up a bit guys! If bleating laugher isn't the best proof that there is a God, I declare myself even more clueless and agnostic than I thought I was... - Manuel from México, D.F.: valinorrim-wiki@yahoo.com.mxManuelcuribe (talk) circa 20:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Roddenberry, Adams, God.... all dead.
-- Love & kisses, Nietzsche.- - XXXOOO 2 U 2 Neesh : ) —Manuel : ) And yep, I get the joke : þ Called "life" last I checked? And Now For Something Completly Blasphemous: I'm going to quote Joss Whedon at you. "The hardest thing in this world is to live in it." That one Ecce Homo enough for ya? I mean the question with love. For real. The chair recognises the honored Gentleman/Lady from Angstland. Kindred, methinks. Manuelcuribe (talk) 07:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
File:St-John-of-the-Cross.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:St-John-of-the-Cross.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
Typos
His writings were first published inJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the Cross 1618, for example, plus several disjointed sentences. I'm not at all knowledgeable of the subject, so won't attempt to edit.
What brought me here was Analog Science Fiction and Fact March 2012 Novelette "Ernesto" by Alec Nevala-Lee, which is preceded by his Biolog by Richard A.Lovett. The story begins in Madrid a year after beginning of the war between the Loyalists and Falangists. It quickly moves to the Church of St. John of the Cross at a monastery in Segovia, the scene of several "miraculous" cures of terminal cancer, with a postscript in Havana a year after the war ends.
“ | Ernesto laughed. "Not much of a miracle. He arranged to remove the hinges from the door of his cell. Now that's the kind of saint I can admire." He looked out at the trees. "If John deserves sainthood, it's because he understood the dark night of the soul. You can look for God all your life and find nothing in the end. And for a true believer, that nothingness is enough. Nada y nada y nada." | ” |
--Pawyilee (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John of the Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708111722/http://it.calameo.com/books/00004334368800212522c to http://it.calameo.com/books/00004334368800212522c
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Conflicting Sources
The section on his early life states he was of converso background but the source (from Roth) only mentions it in passing and does not provide any evidence for it. Meanwhile, the Catholic biographies linked at the bottom of the page, give a detailed account of his family background and do not mention them being conversos. IMO, saying he is a converso just because of the Roth source is undue weight and if kept it should be with the added stipulation that "at least one author alleges" he was from a converso family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:69C1:2A00:91BF:EA5E:FDB0:985C (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Making a redirect
Elsewhere in Wikipedia I have typed in "Juan de la Crux" but got a red wikilink. Can some one please see to making this a redirect to this page? Many thanks, Vorbee (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)