Talk:John o' Groats

Scotland High‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name of the peninsula?

Is there a name used to properly designate the peninsula that is composed of Caithness and Sutherland, collectively (≈ north-eastern Highlands region)? //Big Adamsky 11:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Far North appears frequently in The Caithness Courier and The John O'Groat Journal, but that term appears to have no official status. Also, it seems sometimes to mean Caithness and Sutherland and sometimes Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross. (See Caithness and Sutherland (UK Parliament constituency), Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross (UK Parliament constituency) and Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross (Scottish Parliament constituency). Collectively, Caithness and Sutherland may represent a Norse/Norwegian perception of the Pictish Kingdom of Cait/Cat. Laurel Bush 12:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Page needs geogaphic coordinates

{{GR|#}} I'll give you a cookie!--al95521 05:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct form

It seems unduly doctrinaire to say that "The punctuation and capitalisation in John o' Groats is the correct form." This statement needs (at the very least) to explain who decides the "correct form." The local authority? The Ordnance Survey? The residents' consensus? Certainly the Visit John O'Groats site cited at the end of the article does not use this form. Neither does the local newspaper. The local ferry service uses the space but not the lower case 'o'. I could add many more examples but suffice to say that even the rest of the Wikipedia article doesn't use this so-called correct form. Wouldn't it be better for the article to acknowledge that opinions vary on the "correct form" of the name? Russ London 07:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Rothorpe (talk) 00:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jan de Groot

Jan de Groot is a Dutch name meaning 'John the Large', and he used to row from there to the surrounding islands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.4.131.140 (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see a source for the toponymy of J.O'Groats. Are you sure that it comes from a Dutchman ?--Highlandist (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most northerly point

I removed the following text from the first paragraph of the lead section: "John o' Groats is popular with tourists because it is generally regarded as the most northerly settlement on the island of Great Britain, although this is not a claim made by its inhabitants and is in fact false." I find it unlikely that many people believe that, any more than people would believe that Land's End is the most southerly point. I imagine most people believe that it is the most north-easterly point (depending on how you measure that), and indeed it is. If this claim is readded it needs a citation. Quietbritishjim (talk) 14:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Population

This is a nitpick but surely the population of John O' Groats is either "300 ± 100" or "approximately 300"? It can't be both... 90.206.144.214 (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article's got "310" and "300 ± 10": "approximately 300" seems a better way to go. I'll also add a date for this figure. --McGeddon (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John o' Groats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204083447/http://www.johnogroat-journal.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/3306/Community_buyout_could_save_landmark_hotel.html to http://www.johnogroat-journal.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/3306/Community_buyout_could_save_landmark_hotel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]