A fact from John le Fucker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that John le Fucker's name probably did not mean what you might think it means?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
@Joefromrandb: re this edit. A word meaning a thing – like, say, a "door" – is what we call a "noun". If I want to explain what type of door, I might add an "adjective" to describe it: for example, "a red door". That does not make it a compound phrase, so I do not add a hyphen: "a red-door". That would be incorrect. "A double-murder" is similarly incorrect, at least in the version of English I speak and write. I see you are from Philadelphia, so perhaps this is a case of WP:ENGVAR. I am prepared to concede that "double-murder" may be used as a compound phrase in some strains of American English: I have found – not without difficulty – this example from the New York Post. However, even in the US, it appears to be a minority usage: here, for example, is an unhyphenated example from Boston. And, in any case, this article should clearly follow British English, per MOS:TIES. Otherwise, the only hyphenated examples I can find are adjectival, as in this example from Kansas (referring to a "double-murder suspect") – which is why I referred you to MOS:HYPHEN. If you have any possible argument in favour of your hyphenated version, I suggest you make it here. Otherwise I shall be reverting to the unhyphenated, stable, and correct version in 24 hrs. And, by the way, "Cute" is not an adequate edit summary. GrindtXX (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
