Talk:John de Robeck

Biography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Irish Maritime

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime articles

POV

While I tend to agree that forcing the Dardanelles would have worked, the summary states as fact and certainty an eventuality viewed through the fog of war. Surely the whole can be worded better.Czrisher 01:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

He was born in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. The flag used is for the Irish Republic. Should we use a different one? Ozdaren 23:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goeben

The assertion that there were no forces available (or none that the royal navy were prepared to commit) capable of tackling SMS Goeben seems baseless given that the attacks were led by HMS Queen Elizabeth, a larger, more modern battleship than any available to the defenders. Infact the Goeben was the only dreadnought style capital ship on the Turkish-German side. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.55.124 (talk) 00:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the text as it stands does not mention the Goeben. However, according to Churchill's WWI history, the Queen Elizabeth was able to be assigned to the Turkish campaign rather than going to the Grand Fleet on a temporary basis only. She was a new ship and had to have practice fire to calibrate her guns. This was to be done in the Med, but Chruchill decided (and Fisher concurred) that doing her test firing at the straits would be just as good for calibration, and could immessurably help in the reduction of the forts before she moved on to the Grand Fleet. However, in no case was she to be risked by going into a situation against modern responding fire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.243.198.170 (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]