Talk:John W. Keogh

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that John W. Keogh killed an attorney to encourage redistricting? Source: The Daily Chronicle
- ALT1: ... that John W. Keogh was driven to insanity by malapportionment? Source: The Daily Chronicle
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Patricia Taylor
- Comment: Feel free to suggest other hooks if you can think of something more catchy :)

Created by Elli (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

Elli (talk | contribs) 03:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Wow – that was...interesting. Article looks good and appears to meet all the criteria. QPQ done. Both hooks are interesting, although I prefer ALT0. Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]