Talk:John Stadnik

John Stadnik has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 18, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

American football Low‑importance

	American football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Stadnik/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 15:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 12:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Added cats.
"former American" Change to new lead.
- Changed.
"tied with Brian Glasgow" maybe change to "tied with Brian Glasgow who debuted the same week"
- Changed.
Fixed PFA link.
"Stadnik began attending Western Illinois University in 1979 but did not play for their Leatherneck football team that year" That makes it sort of sound like he wasn't even on the team.
- Reworded (Stadnik began attending Western Illinois University in 1979, although he did not see playing time for their Leatherneck football team that year.) – does that work?
"second-team All-Mid-Continent Conference" add to infobox.
- Added.
"Stadnik was named All-American by Associated Press" Do you know if it's first team or second team? add to infobox.
- Turns out it was honorable mention Little All-American – I don't think honorable mentions are supposed to be in the infobox.
"Stadnik was named All-American by Associated Press" change to "Stadnik was named All-American by the Associated Press"
- Changed.
"He was released by the team on July 18, 1983" Change to Seahawks for better flow here since the Blitz are also mentioned.
- Changed.
"Stadnik was placed on the developmental squad of the Wranglers to begin the 1984 USFL season, on March 18 that year, later being activated on April 1 after two games there" I understand this sentence but you have to read it twice, it's just a tad confusing.
- Split to two sentences.
Link "Oklahoma Outlaws"?
- That'd just redirect back to 'Arizona Outlaws'.
"He was released on August 3, 1988" change to "He was released again on August 3, 1988"
- Changed.
Two sentences feels a little short for a GA lead. I know this article isn't huge and there's not much to say though.
- Added a little.

That's all. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiOriginal-9: BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that all looks good now. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.