Talk:John Rainwater

A fact from John Rainwater appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a University of Washington fake mathematician created as a student prank became the author of several well-received papers in research journals?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/April.

Wikipedia

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

John Rainwater is immortal

Rumors of Rainwater's demise are unfounded:

Where does John Rainwater go from here? It would be a shame if he were to die. [...] It is to be hoped that someone will be able to help John Rainwater carry on, so that in the future people won't ask "Who killed J.R.?"

Quoting from Phelps (2002) ( Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 17:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)). 17:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coda

This very serious comment responds to the change in assessment status from "living=yes" to "living=no"! Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 14:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We don't really have a code to indicate a pseudonym of living or non-living people. Perhaps a note to Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography would help. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 15:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 17:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Currently the text is a bit confusing and it's hard to figure out whether he was fictional or not. The infobox and categories present him as a real prototype, yet the text suggests he is fictitious. Brandmeister^talk 21:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I have trimmed the infobox, removing birth date and nationality and residence, for that reason. I think the whole infobox should go, actually, unless it can be altered to show immediately that Rainwater is fictitious. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can learn by recognizing confusion, if you want to know the truth and can be honest about being confused.

Removing an information box is less drastic than an auto-lobotomy, but does suffice to remove the irritation about confusion.

Perhaps you can contact Math Reviews and ask them to remove the "confusing" entry about John Rainwater?

Kiefer.Wolfowitz 10:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Math Reviews and wikipedia are different publications (using the term loosely) and have different standards. What is done by one doesn't necessarily weigh on what is done by the other. A similar debate, by the way happened at P.D.Q. Bach, another article about a fictitious person who has done real work - albeit humerous rather than serious. IT once had an infobox and, after much discussion, no longer does.

Do you think Nicholas Bourbaki should have an infobox with a "birth date" and the like? (I see that Peter Orno does have one, with the same silly, IMHO, "born" and "nationality" listings.) - DavidWBrooks (talk) 10:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phelps discusses his moment of creation, and life. I don't want to debate your OR or discuss whether you were confused by an infobox. Tough. Life is confusing if you have a brain.

Since you have so much to add to Wikipedia here, I suggest you render similarly sage advice as to whether "Yes album covers" should be recategorized as "Yes (band) album covers".

Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was helpful. (I'm also indenting your comment an extra space, so it's not lined up with mine and doesn't confuse - sorry, that word again - anybody.) - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry David, I'm irritated that the Peter Orno DYK was not on the April Fools page. This article and PO's were always paired, and this has meant that a year's efforts were wasted on PO, mostly because of inane busybody objections by persons who don't know what they are talking about, especially when they think they do. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:44, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you lost me. DYK? PO? I seem to be acronym-deficient. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 01:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bourbaki et al

To serve the casual reader who stumbles across this article, I would like to add in the introduction a short reference to Bourbaki and the fact that this weird process (fake person does real mathematics) is not unique, because I think that is surprising to non-mathematicians. Any objections or thoughts? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea, if it's no more than a short mention. The article's already in Category:Pseudonymous mathematicians, which demonstrates the phenomenon. Ntsimp (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bourbaki has been a collective pseudonym of the leading French-writing mathematicians in the world, where John Rainwater has been notable but much less important. Bourbaki was mentioned briefly by Phelps, as noted in the article. Thus, a short note of N.B. in the lede is plausible. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]