Jump to content

Talk:John Pott (British Army officer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notable

[edit]

My concern with this article is whether or not the subject is Notable. It certainly seems like the band Athlete (band) is notable, and an argument could be made that the documentary and/or song is notable; but what about the subject himself? Outside of references about the song, the only references provided thus far are an obituary, which does not by itself establish notability, and the one article in the Strathspey Herald, which helps but I think is not definitive. I think for this article to survive, we need more references that establish notability outside of the song/video itself.Qwyrxian (talk) 04:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't believe he qualifies for notable people, however he may qualify for military person. I'm not too familiar with British military to know if the subject meet any of the criteria. Meaning, I'm not sure if the MBE or MC would be considered his nations highest or 2nd highest honors. Also, he appears to have commanded a body of troops in a notable battle, but I'm not 100% certain the troop itself is notable. The 156th Battalion is mentioned in the Battle of Arnhem, but are known for a single event. Would think a notable troop would be known for considerable contribution, not just a one day event. Akerans (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The MBE page states that MBE is the lowest of 5 levels of the Order of the British Empire, and it's not strictly a military order anyway (meaning it would need to be judged under general notability rules not, WP:MILPEOPLE. The Military Cross page states that it's the 3rd highest level award, with 2 awards at Level 1 and 3 awards at level two. Thus, on awards alone, the subject is not notable. His rank does not qualify him. It's not clear to me from the article that he "Played an important role in a significant military event; or commanded a notable body of troops in combat." As far as I know, a company does not count as a "notable body." I'm going to post a request for input from the people at the Military WikiProject. And, of course, I'd like to hear the original author's opinions as well. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your request for input at milhist, I've replied in the thread there. EyeSerenetalk 11:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Pott (British Army officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Pott_(British_Army_officer)&oldid=1207657990"