Talk:John Parkinson (botanist)/Archive: GA review
 | This is an archive of past discussions about John Parkinson (botanist). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
GA review
I've taken on this review, due to other commitments, may not be very speedy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimfbleak (talk • contribs) 10:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, take your time. :-) — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 12:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've made one minor revision, checked images and refs, so here goes
Good Article nomination
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Jimfbleak (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wonderful! Thanks for the Christmas present. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 00:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)