Talk:John Mew
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Mew article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 182 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Controversial Claim Removed By Me.
[edit]Controversial Claim Removed By Me.
"Mewing is supported by orthodontic research.[11][12][13][14]"
I removed this. Discussion welcome, but I think it should be obvious that the sources provided did not add up to a scientific consensus or backing from the mainstream orthodontic community. (Also: did any of the sources use the term 'Mewing'?)
I would characterise the sources as, 'followers of the work of John Mew repeating the same claims Mew has made'. This is not scientific evidence to support the claim, it is minority acceptance, minority support.
The passage I removed had these sources
Source 11 https://aomtinfo.org/portfolio-item/oral-myofacial-therapy-a-breakthrough-technique-to-treat-symptoms-relating-to-breathing-problems-tmj-headaches-and-other-common-ailments/ source 12 https://apexdentaliowa.com/jaw-and-facial-development-in-adults/ Source 13 https://kidtherapy.org/helpful-articles/signs-of-improper-oral-resting-posture/ Source 14 https://oralfacialmyologytherapy.com/facial-growth-and-appearance-oral-facial-myology-therapy/
If you see my user page you can hear more about my background with this page. VorsprungDurchReden (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Edit by Garvey 96:
I believe the best replacement is something like "mewing is supported by some professionals arguing that [reasons giving by supporters and indirect evidence]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garvey 96 (talk • contribs) 08:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Evidence for human fossils having well developed jaws and faces
[edit]In the orthotropic section is references a claim of ancient humans almost always having good facial development and all teeth. This line need citations. Articles by Mew on https://orthotropics.com/ frequently reference that 1000 years ago Scandinavians had good teeth but I couldn't find this study.
Garvey 96. Garvey 96 (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Garvey 96 the source does not even discuss mew or his ideas. Zenomonoz (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have since read a referencing guide and see other issue with it. I have removed that suggestion Garvey 96 (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Garvey 96, thanks, although in future it is best to strike your comments rather than delete them, so that other editors can see a clear history of the discussion. This can be done in the formatting options by selecting strike through.
It looks like this. It's fine to completely remove comments that nobody has replied to yet. Cheers. Zenomonoz (talk) 07:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Garvey 96, thanks, although in future it is best to strike your comments rather than delete them, so that other editors can see a clear history of the discussion. This can be done in the formatting options by selecting strike through.
- I have since read a referencing guide and see other issue with it. I have removed that suggestion Garvey 96 (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Origin of mewing
[edit]Mewing has been mentioned on 4chan archives for at least a dozen years, as well as on looksmax.org. Zogzogzog (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- looksmax.org was indexed by google August 2018.
- what is your source? Garvey 96 (talk) 11:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)