Talk:John McWethy

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Indiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Conspiracy theory

Can we knock it off with the adding in of an unsubstantiated claim that the Bush administration was responsible for McWethy's death? This does not belong in the article unless you can cite some verifiable sources. Mantisia (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Videogamer710, please stop adding unsourced, libelous claims into this article. I'm no fan of the Bush administration, but I don't let personal feelings get in the way of verifiable facts. I don't like revert wars, but I will not let your claims stand without proof. Hopefully an editor can come in here and deal with this. Mantisia (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to be talking to myself here... but, Videogamer710, if you would simply add a verifiable and reliable source to your claim I would be perfectly willing to allow your claim to be presented in the article. Mantisia (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion: Agreed. Without any sort of sourcing, it shouldn't be included. I left a note on the user's talk page, so hopefully he or she will jump into the conversation. Until then, I'm not sure there's much you can do aside from reverting. I'll keep an eye on the page as well. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 12:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John McWethy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080213000413/http://www.nae.edu/NAE/naehome.nsf/weblinks/CGOZ-642LZN?OpenDocument to http://www.nae.edu/NAE/naehome.nsf/weblinks/CGOZ-642LZN?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]