Talk:John McCauley/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The article is well written and maintains the correct layout and style.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   The article is well referenced and factually reliable.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   The article is focused and covers the main points.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article maintains a neutral point of view.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   The article does not appear to be affected by edit warring.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   All images are within the public domain according to Australian copyright law. Their release before 1994 also qualifies them for eligibility under American copyright law.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Images are used effectively and have appropriate captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   A very interesting read and a Good Article too. Harrison49 (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)