Talk:John Madden Football '93/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a or will be replaced with a . Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.

Criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Issues found

I found only one issue. Please ensure that all inline references appear in order. For example: ^[4][1][12] should be ^[1][4][12]. Once that's done reply here and it'll be an easy pass. Nice work!

Reviewer: Teancum (talk · contribs) 14:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review. I could have sworn there was a bot to do ref ordering, but I couldn't remember its name. I just went ahead and did it manually. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Passed! --Teancum (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)