Jump to content

Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJohn MacBride (Royal Navy officer) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 3, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that John MacBride (pictured) defeated Hercules and Mars in a single battle?

And

[edit]

...to my edit summary, I'll add that the milhist text is not even clear about whether it wants pictures to be 300px or just using "300px" as a sample of how you should write it - note that it's in a context teaching users what the proper script is. It could be just as example of size, not the size. Dahn (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    The article maintains a good layout and style throughout.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    The article is well referenced.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are used effectively.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    A very interesting and informative article. Harrison49 (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]