Talk:John Hemmingham/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 06:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Need some work, especially with the lead.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
- The lead should have some content from every section.
Done - "first started in football governance" - needs some copy-edit. Done
- "independent supporters group" -> "an independent supporters group" Done
- There is hardly any information about his personal life. Done
- No ref has been provided for his birthday.
- Was already in one of the external links but added as a ref. Done
- Was already in one of the external links but added as a ref.
- The refs should not be written in all caps even if it is done in the source. Done
- Try to see if you can get any free-licensed image.
- I have searched for one but unfortunately I can't find one.
Will try to locate any other possible error. Anyhow the article seems to be good with lead being the only major problem. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 06:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've responded to your concerns. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Some more comments
- There is no source for birth-place in the infobox. Done
- No source for his other name "hema" in the infobox.. Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done those. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Article passed ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)