Talk:John Graham of Duchray

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Graham of Duchray article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It is requested that an image or photograph of John Graham of Duchray be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Biography / British / European / Early Modern Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography section

Wikimedia received an email (ticket:2016110210007831) with a request to remove two paragraphs; the second and third paragraphs of the biography section starting with:

"His exact lineage is uncertain."

While the material includes some sourcing it obviously is not in the format we prefer. The contributor is concerned that this has led to the warning messages at the top of the page and requested removal to justify clearing out the warning messages.

I'm not convinced that the warning messages are all related to those two paragraphs. Clearly, the warning about citations applies to those two paragraphs, but the others do not seem so obvious. In fact I'm not quite sure why they have been added and I will separately leave a note for the editor asking for more information.

I plan to respond to the OTRS ticket and suggest that the best action is to leave the material in and hope that someone with interest in the subject will track down the references and convert them to proper references, as well as determine whether the included material is appropriate for the article. While we would normally push for the editor adding the material to take care of this themselves, the author has health issues as well as the lack of knowledge of Wikipedia syntax so that's not a viable request. The alternative is complete removal and let other editors research and add this material as they see fit.--S Philbrick (Talk) 16:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates

I added the following 5 maintenance templates on November 1, 2016 for reasons stated below:

Notability: The Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide states that "...any person who is only mentioned in genealogical records or family histories, or is traceable only through primary documents, is not notable. Likewise, those who are only mentioned in passing in reliable secondary sources should not be considered notable for the purposes of a stand-alone article, although, depending upon the circumstances, they may warrant mention within an existing article or list." Most sources in the article John Graham of Duchray are him being mentioned in passing and genealogical records. However, it also says that "If, for instance, there is enough information in reliable sources to include details about a person's birth, personal life, education and military career, then they most likely warrant a stand alone article." I'm not sure if this tag should be removed or not.

Editorial: I'll replace this with a tag because there are lots of vague phrasing and unsupported attributions.

Essay: I'll replace this with a tag because it reads like a story being told.

Original research: I misunderstood the meaning of this tag. I will remove it.

Citations broken: The references are all over the place. It's not properly formatted

--Ermahgerd9 (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt response.--S Philbrick (Talk) 15:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]