Talk:John Gardner (British writer)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 20:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
This was very long in the queue. Time to review it.--Kürbis (✔) 20:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- " and Lena Henderson a local Geordie girl" - and Lena..., a local ...
- "Theology" -> theology
- In the lead it says he lost his faith, but it is not mentioned in the subsequent sections.
- "and reviewing the novel in The New York Times, Anthony Boucher wrote, "Mr. Gardner succeeds in having it both ways: " Split from the sentence and start with, eg, "Upon reviewing the novel...."
- That's all
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Hold--Kürbis (✔) 09:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Note I reverted this edit, as it introduced a strange error in the left sidebar. Hope you don't mind. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 20:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- I reinserted this reference and now it is ok. Not sure what caused this error... Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 20:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi GOP, the three tweaks are done, as is the 'loss of faith' information, including a supporting citation. Many thanks for your time and your thoughts on this: it's much appreciated! Please let me know if there is anything else you'd like me to do. Cheers - SchroCat (^ • @) 11:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your changes. I will pass this article. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 13:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Cheers GOP/Kürbis: your efforts are hugely appreciated and I'm very glad that your retirement was only temporary—the project desperately needs to keep people like you on board! - SchroCat (^ • @) 16:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)