Talk:John G. Coltart/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Folklore1 (talk · contribs) 19:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I perform the review, I will fill in the following table. Please look for my notes below the table about recommended improvements. Folklore1 (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	See note about "Style Consistency"
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edit wars.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	5 CC 3.0 images, 1 public domain
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Directly related
	7. Overall assessment.

Style Consistency

The second paragraph of Invasion of Kentucky and Stones River contains the phrase "07:00 on the morning of 31 December". The time in this paragraph should be changed to "7:00 on the morning of December 31" or "7:00 a.m. on the morning of December 31" for consistency with the style for displaying times and dates elsewhere throughout the article. Folklore1 (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done

See the second paragraph of Chickamauga and Chattanooga for "began on 21 August". Folklore1 (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done