Talk:John F. Murphy (JAG)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notable
[edit]How is this subject notable? It appears notability is inherited in this case, and the sources are somewhat dubious. Thank you.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 19:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Primary Sources
[edit]I eliminated the primary sources from the article, as well as the puff piece on Andy Worthington's book, who is hardly notable himself and borders on unreliable because of his zealousness. Thank you.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 19:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Primary source aren't prohited. Policy merely requires they be used carefully. The first two references you cut were primary sources, but they were in my opinion used in a manner compliant with policy. Could you please cite the policy you think they lapsed from?
- I do not believe the third reference was a primary source at all. I do not believe it was unreliable. Please see where I raised this at WP:RSN. Geo Swan (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. Please follow your own advice, as you use them uncarefully. You utilize primary sources to establish notability, and your articles are inevitably the product of original research as a result, with this article being no different than the others. Thus, you use a primary source, then make claims to its content. This violates WP:primary. Moreover, this has been a subject that has been raised here: [1]. I suggest you review this RFC, and follow its advice on this subject. Thank you again.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John F. Murphy (JAG). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722214459/http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/wire/WirePDF/v9/Issue43v9.pdf to http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/wire/WirePDF/v9/Issue43v9.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)