Talk:John Ernst Worrell Keely

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

"She invested $100,000 plus a monthly salary of $250 (around $1.7 million and $500/month in todays values)"

This can't be right, surely?

The ratio of 100k --> 1.7m doesn't equate to 250 --> 500

Thomascjackson (talk) 20:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keely hoax

It has been proved to have been an hoax. This page should clearly state it at the beginning, and not relief on external links section at bottom side of the story. Moreover, it should be stressed out, in "present day" section that "etheral theories" of these days today have no consistence at all, and "vibratory ideas" of Keely, the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.77.56.182 (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has not been proven a hoax, not at all. There are a great many efforts being made today to re-examine and objectively study the philosophies and works of Keely, Tesla, Russell, and other lesser known inventors of the era. There are multiple accomplishments that Keely himself made, which have been rediscovered or confirmed in modern day science. Research and discernment are our friends, let's keep an open and objective perspective. In my opinion these guys were simply way ahead of their time, pioneers if you will, and very soon we will discover what exactly they were on to but leave it to those of us with authentic interest in discerning the truth through science.− (50.53.159.243 (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

John Keely was not a fraud, his device really work on the vibrations produced by sound. Moreover, this technology is associated with the construction of the "Coral castle" Edward Leedskalnin and is directly associated with the construction of the megaliths (pyramids, mastabas, dolmens) ancient civilizations. They are infrasonic interfaces in the Earth, a direct analogue of ultra long radio waves... All this can easily be repeated (video in YouTube: "How to "melt" stones sound" or the text on the website: http://infrafon.ru/lind.html) Серогор (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Ernst Worrell Keely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718031608/http://www.westegg.com/inflation/ to http://www.westegg.com/inflation/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non fact

"In the 19th century most physicists believed, incorrectly, that all of space was filled with a medium called the "Luminiferous aether" (or "ether"), a hypothetical substance which was thought necessary for the transmission of electromagnetic waves and to the propagation of light, which was believed to be impossible in "empty" space. "

As far as I know current popular physics and mathematical models do not depend on the ether but nothing has ever proven the ether cannot exist. This sort of thought loading seems dangerous. If this is not correct please provide current accepted citations that prove that ether does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spamlist (talk • contribs) 23:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Fraud"

How can an Encyclopedia label a person as a "fraud" without citing any reliable source? And even worse, the inventor's occupation was defined as "fraud"! I don't know if you guys have ever read an Encyclopedia and therefore I don't think you're ready to write one. 177.27.26.44 (talk) 22:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it should have been "fraudster". Thank you for pointing out the vocabulary error.

You are free to disregard the extensively-cited Philadelphia Press investigation; we have chosen to take it into account. DS (talk) 05:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]