Talk:John Carpenter (town clerk)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London High‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Life & Connection

I am concerned about how the Life and Connections comments are viewed. I do not see how it is related to the main subject. This needs to be clarified or changed. Maybe the orginal author Iwanafish can correct and bring this article up to date with more supported facts?

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Picture

I added a picture and will add more later.

I will gather more information for a possible re-write or correction in the future.

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Major rewrite

I was unable to confirm the occupations listed in the first article stub. The assumptions and connections were dropped in this version along with a web page that is no longer valid.

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added WPMA, WPLondon and redid WPBio with a listas. Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can this article be given a better rating? What is needed? I like the format. Enfermero (talk) 08:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the process is. Maybe some other veteran wiki editor can help out here. Thank you, I am never sure of the "proper" format to use.

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info Box

Info box added andpicture adjustment. John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisim

Iwanafish continues to vandalize the article. Why? I do not know since he only makes snide comments and restores non-wikified versions. He has done this on several other pages. He refuses to discuss or comment. John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VANDALISM?????????????

The real vandal in this matter is the "Jrcrin" character who obliterated the original page and replaced it with his Mormon genealogy of Carpenter. This genealogy is complete nonsense. The article he obliterated was a straight forward accounting of the historical evidence. The original article can be still found in various non-Wiki scholarly sites such as the official Mercer Company site etc. The new Wiki article is a joke and an insult to scholars and historical scholarship. If anyone doubts the Mormon connection just reference the footnotes and the connection to a Joseph Hatton Carpenter and other Mormon illuminati. --Iwanafish (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Layout

Namely {{TOChidden}} and image on left: both are against the norm, so reverting to them without a rationale is not appreciated. Please try to expand upon your reasons? ninety:one 16:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TOC hidden is used when large gaps appear when the normal TOC is used and when it causes problems for the print link. TOC hidden allows the TOC to be on or off when printing. TOC default is on when printing. TOCs are even a bigger problem when converting to PDF format. TOCs can also be placed elsewhere in the article. It has a current default which many believe must be mandatory, but it is not. You may want to read the TOC and related talk pages.

Many articles have pictures on the left side of the article. Generally speaking, it is frowned upon at the line of a new section, but allowed at the start of sub-sections or within sections. Pictures on the right, the left, the center and in gallery format are all used in wiki articles.

In general, wiki tools are there for a reason. If wiki did not want the hidden TOC option, it would not work. Same for the pictures on the left side.

I hope this explains it to your satisfaction. :-) Jrcrin001 (talk) 04:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Work needed

See:

Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bio Portal placement

I put a question and request regarding the conflicting instructions of the bio portal placement at Portal talk:Biography. Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rating Improvement

Format

Why does this article have such a strange format with the content hidden and the picture right there at the top left? Shouldn't this article look like the rest of Wikipedia?74.109.11.214 (talk) 18:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

heraldry

The "Coat of arms" section appears unrelated to the subject of the article. Also:

the supporters were originally a round-handled sword

I've never heard of swords as supporters before; they're nearly always animate. —Tamfang (talk) 20:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Carpenter (town clerk). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.hmc.gov.uk/NRA/searches/PIdocs.asp?P=4953
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080406062040/http://www.clsb.org.uk/History%20of%20CLS.htm to http://www.clsb.org.uk/History%20of%20CLS.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]